Co-Authored By:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6a5ae/6a5ae8d90e6900b42a28a90c269528ad954580d9" alt=""
Asked by: Maqbool Zerah
religion and spirituality atheismWhat is the Kalam cosmological argument by Al Kindi?
Consequently, what does the cosmological argument state?
In natural theology, a cosmological argument is an argument in which the existence of a unique being, generally seen as some kind of god or demiurge is deduced or inferred from facts or alleged facts concerning causation, change, motion, contingency, or finitude in respect of the universe as a whole or processes within
- the argument from "first mover";
- the argument from causation;
- the argument from contingency;
- the argument from degree;
- the argument from final cause or ends ("teleological argument").
Likewise, people ask, what is infinite regress in the cosmological argument?
Infinite regress is the idea of a process going back into the past with no beginning. Several versions of the Cosmological Argument (Motion and Causality) make it one of their premises that infinite regress is impossible. The idea of an infinite set of things (an "actual infinity") produces absurd conclusions.
The history of this argument goes back to Aristotle or earlier, was developed in Neoplatonism and early Christianity and later in medieval Islamic theology during the 9th to 12th centuries, and re-introduced to medieval Christian theology in the 13th century by Thomas Aquinas.