Co-Authored By:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6a5ae/6a5ae8d90e6900b42a28a90c269528ad954580d9" alt=""
Asked by: Mousa Rass
home and garden indoor environmental qualityWhich is better blown in fiberglass or cellulose?
Thereof, is blown in fiberglass better than cellulose?
Blown-in insulation is an excellent choice to insulate an existing attic because it can enhance the attic's R-value. 2.1 – 2.7 R per inch while Cellulose has an R-value of 3.5- 3.7 per inch. Cellulose is found to be more efficient at retaining its R-value across variety of temperatures than fiberglass.
- Cellulose is the oldest insulation material used for not only the attic, but other areas of the home as well.
- Fiberglass is another traditional insulation material that consists of extremely fine glass fibers.
Accordingly, which is better insulation fiberglass or cellulose?
A given sample of cellulose insulation will provide better thermal performance than an identically sized sample of fiberglass insulation. Per square inch of insulation, cellulose has a higher R-value than fiberglass. With loose fill cellulose insulation, you can achieve an R-value of 3.2 to 3.8 per square inch.
Loose-fill cellulose typically costs about $0.50 to $1 per square foot installed. The cost is similar to that of fiberglass batts but, if anything, slightly less. Damp-spray cellulose costs about $0.60 to $1.80 per square foot of wall space.