Co-Authored By:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6a5ae/6a5ae8d90e6900b42a28a90c269528ad954580d9" alt=""
Asked by: Castorina Heermann
religion and spirituality atheismWhy the cosmological argument fails?
In this way, why is the cosmological argument good?
The cosmological argument is part of classical natural theology, whose goal is to provide evidence for the claim that God exists. On the one hand, the argument arises from human curiosity as to why there is something rather than nothing or than something else.
Additionally, what are the cosmological arguments for the existence of God?
A cosmological argument, in natural theology and natural philosophy (not cosmology), is an argument in which the existence of God is inferred from alleged facts concerning causation, explanation, change, motion, contingency, dependency, or finitude with respect to the universe or some totality of objects.
More specifically, cosmological arguments begin with facts known a posteriori such as: the universe exists, that things are in constant flux or change, that some things are caused to come into existence by other things, and that the universe and almost everything in it is contingent.